A Midsummer Night's Dream: Mrs. Barsanti as Helena, 1776. The complexity of this 18 c. lady's costume is hard to reconcile with the role of Helena: actresses sported the height of contemporary fashion on stage, whatever the role. HMR
STAGING A MIDSUMMER NIGHT’S DREAM
This play is considered one of Shakespeare’s most flawless achievements, unique in being almost without precedent. The blending of the different plots and groups is masterful: the tension between the supernatural icons of male and female, Oberon and Titania, matches the premarital strains hinted between Theseus and his battlefield captive Hippolyta, partly resulting from her negative reaction to the analogous tension between Hermia and her father over his patriarchal choice of her spouse, which is in conflict with her own preference. The intervention of Puck as a kind of cosmic agent of confusion merely objectifies the volatility of the lovers, whose ominous behavior is parodied in the climactic performance of Pyramus and Thisbe staged by the amateurish workmen to celebrate the final happy weddings. The vagaries of human aspiration are epitomized by the bizarre experiences of the egotistical Bottom, transformed to an ass during his attempt at enacting romantic love, yet briefly becoming the paramour of a fairy queen. The lightness and charm of the piece have made it a favorite introduction to Shakespeare, as in our modernized version (Gallery 1.3), but it has been visualized in a wide variety of ways, sometimes quite traditionally (6.2.6-7), sometimes extravagantly, but recently often with quite provocative sexual explicitness, as Jan Kott has proposed (Galleries 2.3.17-19; and 3.2.30-31). However, it is almost impossible not to captivate audiences by the happy incompetence of the workmen’s staging of Pyramus and Thisbe. HMR
Barbour, Charles M. "Up against a Symbolic Painted Cloth: A Midsummer Night's Dream at the Savoy, 1914." Theatre Journal 27 (1975): 521-28.
Berney, Chuck. . "Midsummer Night's Dream on Film: From Hollywood Extravaganza to British Opera." Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter 37.1 (2001): 17, 23-24.
Buhler, Stephen, "Textual and Sexual Anxieties in Michael Hoffman's Film of A Midsummer Night's Dream." Shakespeare Bulletin 22.3 (2004): 49-64.
Burnett, Mark Thornton, "Impressions of Fantasy: Adrian Noble's A Midsummer Night's Dream." Shakespeare, Film, and Fin De Siècle, ed. Burnett, 2000. 89-101.
Clayton, Thomas, "The Guthrie Theater Production of A Midsummer Night's Dream," Shakespeare Quarterly 36 (1986) 229-37. Reprinted in Kehler, Dorothea, ed., A Midsummer Night's Dream: Critical Essays, 472-90, New York and London: Garland, 1998.
Collins, David G. "Beyond Reason in A Midsummer Night's Dream: Stratford, 1981" Iowa State Journal of Research 57. 2 (1982): 131-4
Faust, Richard; Kadushin, Charles, Shakespeare in the Neighborhood: Audience Reaction to A Midsummer Night's Dream , as Produced by Joseph Papp for the Delacorte Mobile Theater. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, for the Bureau of Applied Social Research of Columbia University, 1965.
Foulkes, Richard. "Samuel Phelps's A Midsummer Night's Dream: Sadler's Wells--October 8th, 1853." Theater Notebook 23 (1968-69): 55-60.
Griffiths, Trevor R., editor, A Midsummer Night's Dream, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996. (Shakespeare in production series).
Griffiths, Trevor R. "A Neglected Pioneer Production : Madame Vestris' A Midsummer Night's Dream at Covent Garden, 1840." Shakespeare Quarterly 30 (1979): 386-96.
Griffiths, Trevor R. "Tradition and Innovation in Harley Granville-Barker's A Midsummer Night's Dream ." Theatre Notebook 30 (1976): 78-87.
Halio, Jay L. A Midsummer Night's Dream, Manchester University Press, 1994.
Hall, Edward; Warren, Roger, editors. A Midsummer Night's Drea : A Performing Edition. London: Oberon, 2003.
Hayes, Elliott; Schonberg, Michal, editors. A Midsummer Night's Dream. Stratford, Ontario: CBC Enterprises, 1984.
Hoffman, Michael, William Shakespeare's "A Midsummer Night's Dream", London: Harper-Collins, 1999.
Homan, Sidney. "'What do I do now?' Directing A Midsummer Night's Dream ." Halio, Jay L.; Richmond, Hugh M., editors, Shakespearean Illuminations : Essays in Honor of Marvin Rosenberg, 279-96, Newark: University of Delaware Press; London: Associated University Presses, 1998.
Jensen, Michael P. "Fragments of a Dream : Photos of Three Scenes Missing from the Reinhardt-Dieterle Dream ." Shakespeare Bulletin 18, no. 4 (2000): 37-39.
Kehler, Dorothea, "Marion McClinton's A Midsummer Night's Dream at La Jolla Playhouse, 1995: Appropriation through Performance." In Kehler , Dorothea, editor, A Midsummer Night's Dream: Critical Essays, 472-90, New York and London: Garland, 1998; New York and London: Routledge, 2001.
Knowles, Richard Paul, "From Dream to Machine: Peter Brook, Robert Lepage, and the Contemporary Shakespearean Director as (Post) Modernist." Theatre Journal 50 (1998): 189-206.
Kott, Jan, "Titania and the Ass's Head", pp. 213-36 in Shakespeare Our Contemporary, Garden City, New York: Doubleday. 1966.
Loney, Glenn, editor. Peter Brook's Production of William Shakespeare's AMidsummer Night's Dream for the Royal Shakespeare Company: Complete and Authorized Acting Edition. Stratford-upon-Avon: Royal Shakespeare Company; Chicago: Dramatic Pub., 1974.
McCullough, Christopher J., "Inner Stages: Levels of Illusion in A Midsummer Night's Dream ", 107-15, Cookson , Linda; Loughrey, Bryan, editors. A Midsummer Night's Dream .Harlow, Essex: Longman, 1991.
Mitchell, Ronald E. "Diary of a Dream ." On Stage Studies 4 (1980): 1-19.
Mullin, Michael; McGuire, David, "A 'Purge on Prettiness': Motley's Costumes for A Midsummer Night's Dream , Shakespeare Memorial Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 1954." Shakespeare Studies (Shakespeare Society of Japan) 27 (1988-89): 65-77.
Obayashi, Noriko. "Production Analysis of A Midsummer Night's Dream by Max Reinhardt in 1905." Bigaku 52, no. 2 (2001): 71-83.
Page, Malcolm. "Shakespeare in Vancouver: Guy Sprung's Midsummer Night's Dream ." Canadian Theatre Review 54 (Spring 1988): 24-28.
Quinton, Everett, adapter. William Shakespeare's "A Midsummer Night's Dream" .New York: French, 1995.
Richmond, Hugh M., "The Centrality of A Midsummer Night's Dream," in Teaching Shakespeare Today, ed. James E. Davis & Ronald E. Salomone, Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 1993, 254-62.
Scorer, Mischa, "A Midsummer Night's Dream , 1962." Lawlor, John; and Auden, W. H., editors. To Nevill Coghill from Friends. London: Faber and Faber, 1966. 103-8.
Selbourne, David. The Making of "A Midsummer Night's Dream": an Eye-Witness Account of Peter Brook's Production from First Rehearsal to First Night. London: Methuen, 1982.
Shelburne, Steven. . "The Filmic Tradition of A Midsummer Night's Dream: Reinhardt, Bergman, Hall, and Allen." Screen Shakespeare , ed. Michael Skovmand, 1994. 13-24.
Sprung, Guy. Hot Ice: Shakespeare in Moscow: a Director's Diary. Winnipeg: Blizzard Publishing, 1991.
Talkin' Broadway.com, 1997 - 2010 a project of www.TalkinBroadway.Org, Inc. (search for play title to get recent reviews) .
Watkins, Ronald; Lemmon, Jeremy, In Shakespeare's Playhouse: A Midsummer Night's Dream, Newton Abbot, England: David and Charles, 1974.
Wells, Stanley, "A Midsummer Night's Dream Revisited", Critical Survey 3 (1991): 14-29.
Williams, Gary Jay, "Madame Vestris' A Midsummer Night's Dream and the Web of Victorian Tradition", Theatre Survey 18, no. 2 (1977): 1-22.
Williams, Gary Jay, Our Moonlight Revels: "A Midsummer Night's Dream" in the Theatre, Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1997.
A Midsummer Night's Dream, 1935:Bottom: James Cagney; Quince: Frank Mchugh; Flute: Joe E. Brown; Starveling: J.Patrick; Snout: Hugh Herbert; Snug: Dewey Robinson. Hans Konekamp, Photographer; Max Reinhardt, Producer; W. Dieterle, Director.Warner Brothers. http://www.clevelandmemory.org/copyright/
The Diversionary Tactics of A Midsummer Night’s Dream
Dream is considered one of Shakespeare’s most elegantly crafted and effective plays. The alternation and interaction of several contrasting plots is remarkable: the frame story of the marriage of Theseus and Hippolyta intersects with the debate before Theseus over the marriage choice of Hermia in the face of her father’s opposition. The tension resulting from this conflict reinforces the implicit tyranny of Theseus’ own imposing of marriage on his captive enemy Hippolyta. Such sexual polarization also matches the iconic quarrel between Oberon and Titania, who epitomize the male and female principles in nature generally, specifically in their confrontation over paternal or maternal domination in their familial relations to the adopted Indian boy. The workmen achieve the play’s epitome in their performance of Pyramus and Thisbe which shows the volatility of love relationships, merely symbolized by arbitrary effects of the juice of Oberon’s magical flower. We have staged the young lovers' scenes on their own quite plausibly without the intervention of any magical flower or Puck.
These issues are cleverly managed to provide a highly diversified series of unpredictable scenes, including the astounding sexual seduction of Bottom by Titania, which reinforces the play’s stress on the arbitrary and intimidating nature of sexuality. The importance of this deft fusion of characters, situations, and icons is that it provides a brilliantly diversified stage performance which is hypnotic to most audiences in its oscillation between aristocratic dignity, proletarian bluntness, amatory intensity, and allegorical icons, all further complicated by unexpected reversals of character and commitment. In the theatre any performance above minimal competence of these diverse effects briskly earns audience attention, and there are innumerable opportunities for varying interpretations of these contrasting characters, so that few productions seem repetitive.
The analysis of stage conventions and their audience affect in the workmen’s rehearsals provides some of the best illumination of Shakespeare’s awareness of audience involvement. These discussions come much nearer his own practices and those advocated by Lope de Vega’s El arte nuevo de hacer comedias than the elitist aesthetics of Hamlet’s supercilious address to the actors, which censures many of the bold effects that Dream exploits, such as Bottom’s farcical overacting. Despite the voicing of occasional death threats, the play ends with universal happiness transcending even the basically positive conclusion posited by the conventions of tragicomedy. Ⓒ. HMR